Sorry Owais , We Messed Up

My following blog also appeared on Express Tribune Blogs : http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/story/15039/we-are-sorry-owais-baig/

I was viewing the Facebook profile of a young man from Karachi. Looking at the publically shared pictures, I came under the impression that he loved his nieces and a nephew. His name was Owais Baig.

He appeared to be a typical Karachiite with swarthy, intelligent facial features- looks that gave away small details of his life. You could tell that he was a young man, still studying, working alongside and looking for a better career and just trying to make it in a city of 20 million.

Then I looked at the video of him dangling from a burning building, which ironically belongs to a company that sells life insurance. I looked at the crowd below, entranced by the dance of death. I saw this same man looking down helplessly; to me it was becoming unbearable. I looked away and a few minutes after wards, I heard grown men scream. I knew the whole story, we all know it.

As much as I want to talk about why the people did not help him, why the fire brigade failed for the umpteenth time, I won’t. But I do want to talk about the role that our media played in this whole situation.

To broadcast the clips of a man dangling from a burning building until he falls to his death shows the level of empathy and social awareness that our media lacks. Now, I won’t the blame the whole media, but those involved in this game would get an idea. When we say “O kuch nahin yaar, bus aik do hee marray hain” (Oh man, its not a big deal, just one or two have died), we know that we have been desensitised by the media.

We were glued to our screens when Owais fell to his death.

His death was plastered on thousands of TV screens nationwide. A couple of apologetic TV programs, wailing and mourning and we are back to our daily routine, thinking little about the trauma that Owais’s family went through during the coverage.

They have been scarred for life.

Owais’s parents, brother, his beloved nieces; they have gone through a trauma that few of us would ever face. And unsurprisingly, our media bigwigs remain unapologetic.

In a program by Matiullah Jan called Apna Apna Gareban, the director of a local news channel unapologetically defended his newschannel’s decision to air Owais’s video clip. And the atrocity doesn’t stop here. Right up to the time of writing, not a single statement by any media house has been broadcasted, seeking apology for airing disturbing visuals.

Somehow, the image of Nero fiddling away while Rome burns flashes across my mind.

It’s not as if we lack laws and regulations, it’s just that our TV channels show blatant disrespect towards implementing them. It is specifically stated in PEMRA (Amendment) Act 2007, article 20, clause C that the person who is issued a license by PEMRA must ensure that:

“All programmes and advertisements do not contain or encourage violence, terrorism, racial, ethnic or religious discrimination, sectarianism, extremism, militancy, hatred, pornography, obscenity, vulgarity or other material offensive to commonly accepted standards of decency”

Forgive me, but I assume that our TV channels do not think that the live broadcasting of a young man’s death nationwide constitutes something ‘offensive’.

This September a Fox News presenter’s YouTube clip went viral. It showed a driver being chased by US police in Arizona when suddenly the driver stops the car, gets out, runs a few yards and then shoots himself in the head.

As soon as the presenter realises what the man is about to do he screams,

“Get off. Get off. Get off it. Get off it. Get off it. Get off it!”

And when his channel accidently shows the video he comes on air and responsibly issuing an apology on live television,

“… we really messed up. And we’re all very sorry. That didn’t belong on TV. We took every precaution we knew how to take to keep that from being on TV. I personally apologise to you that that happened. Sometimes we see a lot of things that we don’t let get to you because it is not time appropriate, it is insensitive, it is just wrong. And that was wrong and that won’t happen on my watch…”

Dear TV channels,

If Fox News - which we all know is famous for its biased and right wing stance against Muslims- is capable of such professionalism then I believe you have got a big ethical dilemma on your hands.

Let us therefore not talk about enacting new laws and regulations, as they already exist, but let us enforce them. Let us force our media houses to publicly apologise for this particular error so that they recognise their professional code of conduct and never indulge in such indecency again.

It is time to apologise to Owais Baig and his family.

I do apologise- sincerely, from the bottom of my heart – to Owais Baig and his family.

May his soul rest in peace. Ameen.

Does 'Innocence of Muslims' really deserve our attention?

So here we are again, after blasphemous cartoons, burning Qurans now we have an insulting film.  Many have been injured, some killed, buildings, restaurants, tires, motor cycles and buses have been burned, websites have been blocked, and still the issue is hot.

Up until now, I was reluctant to see the trailer of the movie because frankly I was not interested. I have much bigger issues in life then to waste my time watching trailers of third class movies, which also happen to insult some other religions. But then after seeing and reading about all the violence I decided to give it a go and saw it on YouTube.

My fellow readers, if I believe that Sam Bacile (the producer of Innocence of the Muslims, whose real name is alleged to be Nakoula Basseley Nakoula) says that he financed the project with 5 million dollars then I would also believe that King Kong really did climb the Empire State building. The trailer showed that this movie is a hideous and revolting insult to the art of movie making. Not only that one can clearly see that at some parts it is horrendously dubbed, especially where the name Muhammad comes in. The acting is other worldly bad and the dialogues are offensive. Remember, this movie is supposed to be satirical, but if this was satire then one might as well call Nazi propaganda movies like The Eternal Jew as thoughtful and considerate works of art. This is a crude movie that does not even require big financing, even I can finance this movie with my $10 per hour part time cash in hand job. But if it is, so crude, so childish and so amateurish, then why is it responsible for worldwide violence.

One might blame the attitude of the Muslims; some are calling the Muslims as immature and contend that that this movie is not enough to have sparked worldwide outrage and violent protests. For hardliners in USA and Israel it is a dream reaction, they can now confidently say that, look this is why we are against Islam, it’s a violent religion.

Its critics point out that there is a thin line between good-natured satire and malicious satire, others say that movies like this should be banned because freedom of expression doesn’t meaning hurting the religious beliefs of others. Hardliners from the Muslim camp, point to a sinister conspiracy by the Jews and Americans.

I find some valid points from both the arguments, I believe that killing people and burning cars and buildings in response to a sub-mental dialogued movie is absolutely nonsensical and this movie should have been ignored and I also believe that there should be line drawn when it comes to satire because this movie was not what you would call satire. When somebody knows that this sort of movie will hurt the feelings of Muslims in the same way, a satire about concentration camps will hurt Jews then why do it?

Turns out that the consultant for the movie, Steve Klein did know about the outcome of this whole enterprise. His life mission it seems is to protect his family, especially his granddaughter from ’these monsters’ (referring to Muslims).

So we have a bunch of Islamophobes out there that made a crude anti-Islam movie, but then there are lots of websites, books, documentaries, even seminars, that purport to be anti-Islamic, but should we do violent protests every day just because they insult our religion?  Surely, there can be another, more mature way to register a protest. Why hasn’t any American Muslim sued Nakoula or Steve Klein for being indirectly responsible for the deaths of American citizens in Libya? Or doesn’t anybody from the cast sue the filmmakers for duping them?  Surely, there are ways if one is willing to look.

In my view the only the entities who would benefit from such a situation (and they have always benefited from such situations) are the hardliners from both parties. Its them hardliners who are having a field day and hyping up the issue, which is not worth even a penny.  The public property that we end up burning happens to be our property not Nakoula or Klein’s.  With such actions, we only favor the cause of the extremists and nothing else.

It’s high time that we show some maturity. If one is offended by the movie then don’t watch it (hardly 10 people watched it in USA but which, thanks to the Egyptian cleric, has now been watched by millions), ignore it and the agitators would eventually fade away. Such violence only reveals insecurities of own beliefs rather than being an expression of our strong belief and the love of the Prophet (PBUH).